CyberSage

SERVICES // OFFERINGS

Security engagements with receipts

AI-augmented offensive security for teams that need defensible outcomes, not slide decks dressed as findings. When the question is evidence, the next step is a scoping call and a tier that matches your audit surface. Based in Ireland; engagements across Europe, the UK, and worldwide on request.

AI-powered penetration testing

Pain

Attack surface grows faster than human-led test cycles can cover, and blind spots compound between releases.

Method

Specialist agents coordinate across vectors under human direction, with evidence-grade logging and controlled exploitation.

Outcome

OWASP-scored findings, CVSS prioritisation, and remediation guidance your engineers can ship against.

Vulnerability assessment

Pain

Compliance asks for defensible evidence while internal teams lack cycles for deep enumeration.

Method

Structured discovery across assets with AI-accelerated correlation and deduplication of findings.

Outcome

Risk-ranked backlog with clear owners, suitable for SOC 2 and ISO evidence packs at the right tier.

Web application security

Pain

Modern stacks hide failures behind frameworks. Shallow scans miss auth, API, and session edge cases.

Method

Hybrid automated coverage plus targeted manual validation on business-critical flows.

Outcome

Reproducible PoCs, session modelling notes, and fix guidance tuned to your stack.

Network security assessment

Pain

Flat networks and hybrid cloud sprawl make lateral movement hard to reason about until it is too late.

Method

Segment-aware recon, service intelligence, and safe exploitation within agreed ROE.

Outcome

Topology-aware report with choke points, misconfigurations, and hardening priorities.

Red team operations

Pain

Blue teams rarely see a coordinated campaign until a real adversary runs one against them.

Method

Multi-phase adversary simulation aligned to your detection pipeline, not a checkbox pentest.

Outcome

Timeline narrative, detection gaps, and purple-team handoff for measurable uplift.

Security architecture review

Pain

Architecture decisions ossify. Small design debts become systemic exposure under load or acquisition.

Method

Threat-modelled review against defence-in-depth patterns and your actual control plane.

Outcome

Prioritised control gaps, reference designs, and a roadmap that survives board scrutiny.

PROCESS // HOW WE WORK

From scope to defensible delivery

1

Scope

Define targets, rules of engagement, and success criteria

2

Assess

AI-coordinated testing across multiple attack vectors simultaneously

3

Analyse

Findings correlated, deduplicated, and severity-scored (CVSS/OWASP)

4

Report

Professional deliverables with remediation guidance and verification testing

FIT // SIGNALS

Who this is for — and who it is not

This is for you if…

  • You need defensible evidence, not a PDF generated once and filed away.
  • Engineering and security share ownership of remediation — we speak both languages.
  • Scope is negotiable; integrity of the test is not.

Probably not a fit if…

  • Compliance theatre only — audits without appetite to fix findings.
  • Testing production without written authorisation or change windows.
  • Chasing the cheapest quote when risk is existential to the business.

ENGAGE

Ready when you are

Every engagement starts with a scoping call. If we are not the right fit, you will hear it upfront. No pipeline theatre. Compare tiers on Pricing before you write. It keeps the first conversation concrete.

Book a scoping call →